[[email protected]]

Andre Jute wrote:

Ignore the little nobody. He'll shrivel and dry out from our lack of
attention, then his husk will blow away in the wind of change. No one
will remember his name.

You're probably right about Worthless Wiecky, any response will just
feed his craving for recognition. I dropped a dime on Peter Wieck and
discovered that he is "A jumped-up janitor who speaks presumtuously to
people. He's useless, given the job out of charity. His natural level
is holding the elevator door for the departmental cat." Like you say,
harmless, beneath contempt, not worth any effort.

Tennis court lizards forever!

That gave me a lift. Bless you.

Regards,

Gray


Andre Jute wrote:
wrote:
Iain Churches wrote:
"Peter Wieck" wrote in message
...snip...
I am puzzled why you seem to need to bring Andre Jute into every post
you make.

Peter Wieck is a stalker. He can't help himself.

Google reports that "Peter Wieck" sent 293 posts about
Mr Jute since Mr Jute last paid even momentary attention to "Worthless
Wiecky".

Mr Jute's silence has about it the loud ring of eloquent contempt.

Good golly, no. The answer is in your headline: "Worthless Wiecky"...
Contempt requires volition, evaluation and an allocation of energy.
After I decided Worthless was beneath contempt and utterly harmless, I
simply told my newsreader to stop noticing him. He's a nothing out
there in the void, his existence empty until we recognize him.

Regards,

Gray

I had my first stalker when I was 13 and published a couple of volumes
of poetry. She was a lot more attractive than Worthless Wiecky. I hope
that isn't an inevitable progression!

Ignore the little nobody. He'll shrivel and dry out from our lack of
attention, then his husk will blow away in the wind of change. No one
will remember his name.

Andre Jute
Tennis court lizards forever!