View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
ScottW
 
Posts: n/a
Default Even Richard Perle wants Condi to testify under oath


"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Mikermckelvy" wrote in message
...
From: "Sandman"


http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...ission.html?hp


She has testified under oath you twit, behind closed doors.


No, she answered questions, *not under oath* before and *not* before

the
public, you twit. She's a lying coward. Even Republicans are

demanding
she
testify *under oath* and *before the cameras* just as Richard Clarke

did.

Why do you feel you have to lie for such scum, Bug-Eater?


Here's the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/29/po...29PANE.html?hp

"Ms. Rice met with the commission in February to discuss pre-Sept. 11
initiatives, but an official involved in that meeting said the White

House
insisted that she not be put under oath and that the session not be
recorded. Commissioners were allowed to take notes, but no transcript of

her
comments is thought to exist."

Like the Terrierdork,


Another lie from our stereotyping leftist senior citizen parent.

How much ordinary income did you have this year besides dividends
and interest? I bet zippo.

ScottW