"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Mikermckelvy" wrote in message
...
From: "Sandman"

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...ission.html?hp


She has testified under oath you twit, behind closed doors.

No, she answered questions, *not under oath* before and *not* before the
public, you twit. She's a lying coward. Even Republicans are demanding
she
testify *under oath* and *before the cameras* just as Richard Clarke did.

Why do you feel you have to lie for such scum, Bug-Eater?

Here's the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/29/po...29PANE.html?hp

"Ms. Rice met with the commission in February to discuss pre-Sept. 11
initiatives, but an official involved in that meeting said the White House
insisted that she not be put under oath and that the session not be
recorded. Commissioners were allowed to take notes, but no transcript of her
comments is thought to exist."

Like the Terrierdork, Duh-Mikey just regurgitates here the right-wing media
whores' lies and propaganda, or just makes **** up as he goes merrily along.

So who's the "twit" here, Mikey? Only three possilities. (hint: ask
yourself: "me, myself, or I?")