Mark, I bow to you. Anyone who can use the word psychophysical and
offer me scientific explanations as to why I'm wrong is in another
stratosphere.

It's not a tough word. Sound it out.

I'm not worthy to debate you. I give. The information that
I offered is blasphemy. Everyone read it at your own risk. BTW, what is
your definition of "hobby"?

I think music is a hobby. Installing sound systems is work. I also don't
consider mowing your lawn a hobby either.


P.S. Not every tweak(and 2 ohms vs. 4 ohms is an attempt to tweak) is an
improvement, and I clearly stated that build quality is a huge factor.

The assumption in this conversation was that the amplifier was capable of
actually running at 2 ohms. Otherwise, the point is moot.

If you don't agree or it doesn't apply to your set-up, wonderful. But I
think there are some knowledgeable people(maybe even some who are
familiar with psychostuff) who will agree. Have a nice day.

What I said is not opinion, it's FACT. That is, it can be demonstrated
through the use of laws of physics and known psychophysical parameters (I
know you cringe at the word - I apologize for not having a better one
handy). It can also be verified experimentally quite easily. If you don't
want to believe that it's true, then suit yourself. If instead you'd like
to have an open mind, then you only need to ask and I'll provide the
appropriate references (and if I have them handy, I can email pdfs to you).