Arny Krueger wrote:

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
hlink.net

Sandman wrote:


http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=4560969


Now when Bush refuses Kerry can point out that Bush really is hiding
from his record. If Bush doesn't debate, he looks hypocritical. If
he does debate, Kerry will eviscerate him.

This would be Democratic hype-master Sanders speaking. Should you believe
predictions of the future from a guy who still thinks that tubes rule?

No, but I've heard Kerry. He's a slick as they come Senator who
can wrap almost anything to spin his way on the fly. Exactly
the person you never really want to go up against unless you
are either squeeky clean or better at it than he is.

Exactly. 90 I.Q. rich boy versus a 150 I.Q.+ consumate career
statesman. Kerry will make him look like Regan did with Carter
if there is a debate.

So you think that GWB has an IQ of just 90?

That would be my educated guess. Drugs kill off brain cells,
afterall.

So you think that the respective IQs of Carter and Regan line up like that,
too?

No, actually, Carter was smarter than Regan - but in a debate,
he wasn't the ex-SAG president and career politician that
Regan was. Like comparing you to Yustabe - poor Yustabe's
at such a disadvantage going in based upon his debating
skills that even when he gets it right, it almost always
sounds wrong.

Bush so far has a bad case of foot-in-mouth disease and
bumbling-idiot-commentism. Kerry's going to bait him
again and again in a debate and make him completely
fall apart. Then Kerry's going to spit out exact data
and plans versus Bush's soundbyte retorts.

It's going to be the best comedy show in ages. The
master debater versus the soundbyte kid.