On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:25:53 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Not at all, Weil. It would appear that you would be so highly confused that
I would propose that there be serious conversation on RAHE.

Boy, *that's* certainly a change of opinion.

http://tinyurl.com/2wojl

(too much juicy stuff there to quote here...)

I especially *love* this one:

http://tinyurl.com/2845f

"and too on topic and civil.
And you contribute to the civility around here exactly how? By calling
people idiots? Do you think that they'd tolerate that over there at
RAHE?
You need to get out more. I have stuff on RAHE all the time.

The bottom line is that those who can, do and those who can't have
plenty of excuses".

I guess that you're now the one who *can't* and you've got plenty of
excuses. Plus, there's that great misplaced comma to chuckle at.

Then there's the previous lauding of RAH-E:

http://tinyurl.com/22lkl

"RAO is unique in terms of how extremely dysfunctional it is. RAO is
so dysfunctional that Usenet has even created two newsgroups whose
charters prohibit most if not all of the warfare on RAO, one
moderated (RAHE) and one not (AAE). Both are far more successful than
RAO, by most reasonable criteria".

Gotta love Google...