Stereophile
"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Orbatrox wrote:
I
AZ Nomad wrote:
I quit reading stereophile when they had reviewers that thought the
tice clock really worked and that the diameter of a digital cable
affected the treble response.
LMAO ! That's worth giving Atkinson a hard time over - subjective or
not !
Do you have these articles handy ?
Kal gave you the URL for Stereophile's coverage of the Tice Clock.
Hardly the ringing endorsement the original poster appears to think,
as Tice canceled all of its advertising following publication.
Regarding
the second claim, I don't recall Stereophile publishing anything like
"the diameter of a digital cable affected the treble response." Could
someone give a reference please.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
I remember reading that review too and from I can recall the review
pretty
much
said "bull****" to the claims.
That Tice Clock was one of the more memorable blatant attempts at ripping
off
the public.
That green marker was a good one too.
How much did the marker cost?
Deepends if you used the 'right one' ($15, Imthink)
or a generic one, 99cents.
I tired both, they both made a difference, both made most of
the cd's sound worse.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|