A reasonable argument against double blind tests?
"j." wrote in message
oups.com...
Robert Morein wrote:
"j." wrote:
I've looked around a bit for this, and it seems it must have been
mentioned before - but I think there's a pretty compelling argument as
to why double blind tests aren't always the be all end all. (yeah,
this could get bad - I'm no expert
You're right - you're no expert.
Get lost.
Right, as I said I am no expert. I also said I'm sure this argument
must have come up before, but I was unable to locate the thread.
So obviously, there is a common counter augment to this - I'm just
trying to find out what it is.
If there is already a consensus on this, I'm just trying to determine
what it is.
evidently not.
Keep on wanking.
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|