View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default A reasonable argument against double blind tests?

"j." wrote in message
oups.com
Robert Morein wrote:
"j." wrote:
I've looked around a bit for this, and it seems it must
have been mentioned before - but I think there's a
pretty compelling argument as to why double blind tests
aren't always the be all end all. (yeah, this could
get bad - I'm no expert


You're right - you're no expert.

Get lost.


Right, as I said I am no expert. I also said I'm sure
this argument must have come up before, but I was unable
to locate the thread.

So obviously, there is a common counter augment to this -
I'm just trying to find out what it is.

If there is already a consensus on this, I'm just trying
to determine what it is.


The consensus among Robert and Art is pretty obvious - they hate DBTs. This
is pretty common on RAO - its a rite of passage for people who want to avoid
trouble with George Middius who tries to rule this place.