On Thu, 18 May 2006 09:07:41 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 May 2006 01:14:09 -0500, "Sylvan Morein, DDS"
wrote:

Article , "paul packer"
wrote:
The reasoning processes by which you arrived at
the conclusion Mr. sound was Richard Graham just strike me as too
subtle and circuitous. Is there any firm evidence not based on
inference and supposition? More to the point, if you presented the
evidence you currently have to a court, would they convict or dismiss?
I suspect the latter.
It's you that's " over-intellectualising", Paul. The reasoning process by
which you have these discussions presupposes that Robert Morein is a
thinking, rational human being. However he's made these spurious charges
against many others, whom he stalks relentlessly - including one of your
own
countrymen. The "wackjob bob" moniker attached by Dr. Graham is a whole
lot
closer to the truth than Bob's own semilucid conversations with you. We've
already begun to get legal communications from the real Dr. Graham which
is
how Bob knows so much of how ISP's subpoena computer records. Stay clear -
this one is going to get ugly.

I'll certainly be happy to sit this one out as you suggest, Mr.
Morein. BTW, may I say how well you write for such an elderly
gentleman. Such facility of mind is not only astonishing in a man of
your advanced age, but an exemplar for us younger folk.
Congratulations. :-)

Paul, you just called him ""Mr.". He's a doctor. Give him the respect he
deserves :-)


Oh God!!! Sorry, Doctor.