Michael McKelvy wrote:


dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:03:06 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

of course. Let's start with all the
ridiculous accusations of "fraud" he's hurled at Dr. Richman.

I said at the time and I still maintain he is either not who he says he
is
or that he is not a psychologist.

What possible proof do you have of this?

Absolutely none, it's an opinion I get to have.

It's a lie you get to make.,




He acts like a jerk IMO.
He doesn't act like any sort of psychologist I've ever read or met.



Having
some idea of professional conduct, I don't believe he's who he says he is.
If he is who he says he is then the world is a sadder place because of it
IMO.


And there we have it folks, from the person who never knowingly lies according
to his most recent RAO pronouncements.


If McKelvy ever met any psychologists (which is doubtful), he obviously failed
to profit from anything they had to say. Of course, his 7 year history of
libel and false statements disqualifies him from rendering any type of
judgments about professional behavior of psychologists. He also fails to
recognize the rather obvious fact that RAO is not an environment in which
people are required to "act professionally", especially when discussing audio
opinions, not their given vocations.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist