On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:24:27 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:03:06 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

of course. Let's start with all the
ridiculous accusations of "fraud" he's hurled at Dr. Richman.

I said at the time and I still maintain he is either not who he says he
is
or that he is not a psychologist.

What possible proof do you have of this?

Absolutely none, it's an opinion I get to have.

I see. So if a "liberal" states an "unsubtantiated opinion, he gets
slammed, but if you do it, it's "OK" because you get to express an
opinion.

Nice.

He acts like a jerk IMO.

So do you? So what's your point?

He doesn't act like any sort of psychologist I've ever read or met.

Maybe you could tell us about your psychologist. Does he or she just
nod while you spout off?

Having some idea of professional conduct, I don't believe he's who he says he is.
If he is who he says he is then the world is a sadder place because of it
IMO.

I see. You aren't allowed to defend yourself on RAO or get to play
rough and tumble like everyone else because you are a 'professional".
Sounds like dirty pool to me.