"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"George M. Middius" wrote in message
.. .


dave weil said to Little ****:

I never knowingly say anything I know to be untrue.

Fair enough.

Mc****ty is a known liar,

When did you start calling yourself McShiity?

of course. Let's start with all the
ridiculous accusations of "fraud" he's hurled at Dr. Richman.

I said at the time and I still maintain he is either not who he says he
is
or that he is not a psychologist.


Then your claims about not knowingly lying about individuals are,
themselves,
lies.

It's my opinion. You get yours, I get mine.

Either that, or you choose to make statements about myself and others
with no factual evidence to support them.

I told how I got the info on you. It's either true or not. it changed
nothing about how I see your behavior here.

Just as you have chosen to believe
false information about George Bush, because it is congruent with your
belief
system, you have chosen for many years to believe false information about
me
because of your longstanding vendettas, prejudices and false beliefs about
me.

Now there's something I don't do, I don't just make **** up out of whole
cloth. I don't have any vendettas against you, I just don't like you. I
don't like your trying to claim you know anythiong about anybody bad on you
read on RAO.

Act like the professional you claim to be.

In both cases, you've also chosen to perpetuate this bull**** on RAO. I'm
not
surprised that you've issued a retraction re. Bush, since to not do so
would
damage your credibility even more. As for your credibility re. the false
statements you've made about me for many years, I neither demand nor
expect a
retraction, because quite frankly, other than your role model, Krueger,
and a
few other anonymous posters who apparently are afraid to identify
themselves,
few take these lies of yours seriously and/or believe them.

You really are quite dense. Krueger is not my role model.
I have said this repeatedly and you choose to ignore it.

Once again you accuse me of lying when you have nothing to base that on.
I've told why I don't like or respect you and it has nothing to with
anything anybody said about you, it has only to do with your own deplorable
behavior.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist





And
taken as a whole, his support for Krooger constitutes a huge pack of
lies.

Actually it constitutes dislike for a whole pack of lies.

Such as claiming Krooger is an advocate of "science" or
"truth" or "accuracy" -- those are all ridiculous, and unless
Mc****ty himself claims to be insane, they are all lies as well.

When it comes to audio, I beleive that to be true as do others who
similar
training and expierince in electronics.

The fact that you don't understand this, or refuse to accept it shows,
what
a sack of **** you are. But then we always knew that.



Then there's the infamous Krooger-Atkinson non-debate.

It was a non-debate because Mr. Atkinson never wanted one.

Mc****ty
still claims that John Atkinson was the one who chickened out.

In the first instance when challenged by Arny, Atkinson changed it to a
forum where he would be a moderator and not a debator. I call that
chickening out.

And
how about the various claims that certain RAO posters are members of
NAMBLA -- are those lies or just clumsy dork humor?

I wasn't the one that started accusing people of Being members of NAMBLA.
I
don't know who started it, I do know the first instance I SAW OF IT was
from
your asshole buddy Singh.

At any rate, duh-Mikey may have choked down a slice today, but it's
a rare occurrence. And he's certainly not above lying about anything
he wants, anytime he wants to.

How is it you figure you can win an argument by claiming that other
people
do what you do? Never mind, Iknow, it's not argument, it's parody, right
George?

Oh yeah, who the **** are you?