Dave Weil wrote:


On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:03:06 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

of course. Let's start with all the
ridiculous accusations of "fraud" he's hurled at Dr. Richman.

I said at the time and I still maintain he is either not who he says he is
or that he is not a psychologist.

What possible proof do you have of this?







Although McKelvy has been making libelous statements like this for about 6 or 7
years on RAO, he's never been able to subxtantiate any of them, nor will he
ever be able to in the future, either. Not that this matters to him, of
course.

In point of fact, I've held a license to practice psychology in the state of
Florida since 1981. In a detailed response to one of Ferstler's idiotic
attempts to smear me, I detailed quite a bit of factual information about my
training, experience, credentials, etc. All of what was stated there could be
easily verified and most of it is a matter of public record. Also, for an
individual to claim that they are a psychologist without being able to prove
it, at least in Florida (and probably most other states), is a felony.
Needless to say, none of this matters to individuals such as McKelvy, who has
demonstrated both in regards to Bush and obviously myself, that he will quickly
say anything about anybody that supports his belief system, irrespective of
whether there are any facts to support it. By his own account, he chose to
"believe" a claim about Bush's pilot status that he heard on the radio; he has
also chosen to believe, and perpetuate on RAO recently, false information about
me that he "heard" from an unidentified source whom he claims requires to
remain anonymous. In both cases, he chose to perpetuate false claims simply
because they were congruent with his belief system. In both cases, he was
lying. In both cases, he was wrong.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist