"ScottW" wrote in message
oups.com...

Just search the AES site for ABX.

This test used ABX and was presented to AES in Germany.
http://www.hfm-detmold.de/eti/projek...paper_6086.pdf

BTW...heres a positive ABX test on room acoustics.
http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/cgi/viewco...text=recording

and heres a positive ABX on subwoofer locations vs frequency.
This is interesting as it compares ABX and AB.
Data doesn't declare one over the other for sensitivity.
http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~kim/aes2004sanfrancisco.pdf

Heres an IEEE paper on voice conversion methods using
ABX.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freea...number=1221719

And an AES paper on switching 1 bit digital streams
that had an unexpected positive on a 50 kHz BW requantization.
http://www.extra.research.philips.co...01/dr_edit.pdf

or rejection by other
experimenters.

I find far more evidence of acceptance in puplished material
than I can for rejection as well as a couple of the
elusive positives in ABX you call for.


In medical research such a proposal would have been dead and buried
at birth. It is worse than putting a cart before the horse.
You can't "disprove" something that does not yet exist

Everything originates and goes through a period of development. If all
ideas
were killed at birth...there would be little progress in the world.

Ludovic Mirabel
P.S. I hope we're setting an example to fellows RAOers. I for one
prefer to
disagree, if I have to, while respecting my opponent..

I've spent some time compliling quite a bit of information for you
to contemplate...most directly available on the net.
I hope you give it fair consideration.

Interesting compilation, Scott.

Don't expect Mirabel to give it any credence. He's on a mission from
Middius...

LOL!