AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - Middius The Misogynist (Or "Question for Jenn: Pt. 2")

In article . com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said to Shovels:

The next time you think George is such a sweet nice guy

But your straw man argument is also noted, as I've
never said that George is a "sweet nice guy".

God forbid! :-)

I think Shovie wants you to unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of
profanity and insults. If you don't do that, according to Kroologic
and/or Shovelslogic, that means you admire and endorse everything I say.

Of course.

Sorry to inform you, but this too is a form of character attack, Jenn.

Sigh. No, just an opinion about an observation. Feel free to ignore
it; I'm wasting no more time on it.

Middius writes a slew of defamatory lies (" I think Shovie wants you to
unleash an over-the-top screeching tirade of profanity and insults, if
you don't do that, that means you admire and endorse everything I
say."), attributes them to me, you politely agree with him, hence
attributing George's defamatory lies to me yourself.

He and Arny seem remarkably similar in that way.

Funny you say that, because you seem remarkably similar to Arny, to me,
in your replies. Anyway, you're no longer a RAO virgin. You certainly
can't say you haven't made unprovoked character attacks and/or joined
in the mudslinging (see ABOVE).
You say you avoid these sorts of posts, yet you seem to be very much
involved with attack posts lately. For me, it means there are no
exceptions on RAO. Everyone is the same. As far as attacking goes,
George is far worse than Arny ever was, to me. Arny has a greater sense
of ethics than George, and I've never seen him write **** like this
title that George wrote in this thread:

" Shovels the Jamie-Bitch**** "

As a woman, do you have any comments on it, and as you claim to have a
sense of ethics, why are you talking to George here like he's your best
friend,

Where?

and not condemning him for bringing the group down to the level
of where it is now acceptable to write such hateful misogynist things?
If everyone were as much of a sick lowlife as George as to write such
violently distasteful things about women on this group, how much longer
would you stay here?

Look, I'm going to say this one last time, and I hope that you get it
this time: I DON'T COMMENT on everything that I deplore that is written
in this group. I do point out obvious hypocritical attitudes. For
example, if George had been critical of other people using foul names
from women, and then did it himself, I would have commented. Get it?
Otherwise, everyone can post every stupid thing that they want, I don't
care.