JBorg, Jr. wrote:
ScottW wrote
elmir2m wrote:
ScottW wrote:
elmir2m wrote




Don't tell me who is a supporter of what. Just give a reference
to ONE SINGLE audio component comparison by S.
Olive using ABX.
For that matter give a reference to ANY component comparisons
by ANYBODY that appeared in an *audio professional Jornal*.
This request has been repeated again and again for the last five
years. So far no takers. Be the first.
You have forty years of ABX to look through.

Ludovic Mirabel
P.S. I know Sean Olive papers because he sent them to me
unasked.

If thats the case...why did you so grossly misrepresent them?

ScottW

As I forecast this undead whom I showed up to be a lying ignoramus did
not answer, piped discreetly down, waited a suitable interval hoping it
will be all forgotten and now reemerges.

DeLudo, If you had any real appreciation for the truth you would be
grateful for my pointing out your errors. Obviously, your ridicule
reveals you to be a lying slave to an agenda rather than the truth.


Is there a way to reflect upon these errors with regard to the truth
as stated above?

Sure, search this group for the Terms ABX and Olive, author Ludovic
Mirabel and follow the numerous threads. You will see repeatedly
that Ludo uses Olive's work to discredit ABX while Olive clearly states
that he was not interested in difference as the speakers under
evaluation were both subjectively and objectively different (note,
Olive didn't discuss how that objective difference was determined), so
he moved on to the more interesting question to him, preference.
A question which most will agree, ABX isn't designed to address.

Review the history for yourself before drawing conclusions. Ludo
likes to obscure reality with volume so it is a tedious effort.

ScottW