ScottW wrote:

DeLudo, If you had any real appreciation for the truth you would be
grateful for my pointing out your errors. Obviously, your ridicule
reveals you to be a lying slave to an agenda rather than the truth.
At your advanced age, you should really wonder if that is the way you
want to finish your life.
ScottW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
One should not allow oneself to get entrapped in a correspondence with
this thing that glories and crows in triumph every time it manages to
get his elders and betters to respond.. But just this one time...
Scenario:
I said: I know Sean Olive papers because he sent them to me unasked.
The mud-slinger answered:

If thats the case...why did you so grossly misrepresent them?

ScottW
I answered:
As I forecast this undead whom I had shown for a lying ignoramus did
not answer, piped discreetly down, waited a suitable interval hoping it
will be all forgotten and now reemerges.
And I added

"You quote my misrepresentations and I'll quote yours. Quote means
QUOTE
not your travesty. I'll quote you OK.- it will be a pleasure"

The artful dodger in his answer cut this last sentence of mine.
A characteric trick worthy of this ankle-snapping mud slinger.
His answer:
DeLudo, If you had any real appreciation for the truth you would be
grateful for my pointing out your errors. Obviously, your ridicule
reveals you to be a lying slave to an agenda rather than the truth.
At your advanced age, you should really wonder if that is the way you
want to finish your life.
ScottW
He "pointed out my errors" but the pointing remains his secret. He
will not respond to the invitation to quote. The truth is that if I
made any errors he'd be the last person to spot them.
Well- here it is. No more replies till we get something more than
mud-slinging.
Go and bark at the Mexican grape pickers for a change.
Ludovic Mirabel