"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message
news Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you
did this, you included a few of your own words,
although the meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you
forwarded my own posts to me without a single word of
your own. Apparently you want me to guess what you're
feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack
threads titled with someone's name,

Meaning that I mentioned it once; far less than Arny.

she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Note that George has never whined about having his name
in the title of an "attack thread" like you have, then
turned around and did that himself.

I never said that George whined about it.

And I never said that you said that George whined about
it. That's totally beside the point. Red herring
argument.

He's so desperate for attention
that he probably loves it. Think of him as Paul Packer
with arthritus or something like it, waiting for some
underpaid care giver to change his Depends.

However thanks again Jenn for showing that you are RAO's
mistress of the red herring argument.

Thanks for showing that you don't know what a red herring
argument is.

As a service to the google-impaired:

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-herring.html

Did YOU make a point of being critical of
those who use someone's name (yours) in the title of an
attack thread? Yes, you did.

Of course. They did it gratuitously.

Did you then do that yourself? Yes, you did.

The difference being that I generally only do it in self-defense.

For example, I let Paul's gratuitous re-gurigitation of that old news steep
for a few days before responding the first time. This gave the Middius
clique plenty of time to be criticized for the obvious fact that they are a
bunch of lemmings who pile onto some really lame crap and wallow in it like
the pigs they are.

Did you then criticize me for
not being critical of George for doing it? Yes, you did.

Of course Jenn- making the point that you are very selective in your
whining. Your idea of justice is not based on fairness - its based on your
likes and dislikes.

Has George ever whined about it and then acted
hypocritical by doing it himself? No, he didn't.

Actually George has done this many times in the past, if memory serves.
Given that its so hard to admit you're wrong even when presented with
irrefuatable facts, its not worth the trouble to do the searching for you.

Did you? Yes, you did.

So what, Jenn?