soundhaspriority wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
news
paul packer wrote:

wrote:

[snip]


His L shape tweak actually reveals his true identity. If Morein took the
time to look around the related Yahoo group he'd find out exactly who SHP
is.


Fella, please let me know, and I'll take a look at the group.
Thanks,
Bob Morein



Robert, when I was in conflict with SHP and was meaning to carry the
conflict over to real life I went to the Yahoo group linked from the PWB
site and found out who SHP was. So in essence you have all the knowledge
you need to get to that information.

I think the conflict, the escalation, the hate between you and SHP has
already gone into a lose-lose situation so I would advise you, from one
human being to another, to not to take it any further and into the real
world once you really do find out who SHP is. I was about to take action
against SHP when, as a sheer coincedence I tried out the pinhole tweak
(I was going to eventually try that tweak in any case since I needed to
be sure of the legitimacy of my position before spilling the conflict
into real life) and lo and behold! the tweak worked overwhelmingly. You
all know the rest ; I had to back off from my position and actually I
have thanked him for his tweaks after that. Now I realise that spilling
this usenet conflict over into real life would have been the silliest
thing to do, much much more sillier then trying out the pinhole tweak
for instance. I see that you are already in a very destructive and
long-winded lose-lose situation with a "McCarty". Why would you need
another one on your back? (And why don't you guys just go your own ways
with this McCarty anyways?)

Is SHP a "shill" for PWB? In my opinion, no. The reasoning: Isn't this
an opinion newsgroup about audio? If someone says good things about a
given amp, cd player, recording label, whatever, is (s)he shilling for
that company now? No. SHP has a right to his opinion about PWB stuff as
much as Jenn has a right to her opinion about the recordings of this or
that label shostakovitch record (for instance), etc, which she freely
expresses and which I thank also *her* for since I have already made use
of a couple of posts.

I would have this suggestion to you: Stop seeing RAO as your turf or
whatever it is you may see it as that leads you to think you should (or
could, for that matter) restrict a given persons right to express this
or that opinion, no matter how obnoxious that set of opinions might be
to you. That kind of position is against the whole logic of usenet.
There is this "institution" called killfile. Just use it against SHP, I
would say. I would suggest the same for SHP against you. This kind of
arrangement would get you guys less stress nand less aggrevation, less
conflict, etc. In this group I have put one "borg-to-the-last-drop" kind
of an entity in my killfile and yes, it's OK.