"Sandman" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:ddeVb.9518$IF1.5439@fed1read01...
"Sandman" wrote in message
...
Captain Fire Farter; "The" wrote in message
news:i6i8205l3q0ccjsdo6gqk206ajcc2car5o@rdmzrnewst xt.nz...
On 6 Feb 2004 12:00:22 -0800, (ScottW) wrote:
My wife this in feels with miesos. It has already but of two months
of
state. We are very contentments!
Makes as much sense as most of your posts.
I thought you'd succumbed to the Big Snap, note.
"en sienta" was a typo: s/b "encinta" (meaning pregnant).
Finally got hold of some virile sperm. Who's the father?
Moi - and my "super sperm", ****wipe.
"miesos" is Peruvian for twins. Therefore, "encinta con miesos" means
pregnant with twins. Of course, the Terrierborg hasn't been to Peru -
he's
never left his cesspool.
"of state" is only one meaning of "estados" - "in this condition" is
the
appropriate meaning of "de estados" in context - thus, "mi esposa
tiene
ya
mas de dos meses de estado" means "my wife has already been in this
condition more than two months."
"Estamos muy contentos" means we're very happy.
Of course the Terrierborg knew what I was saying, although his Spanish
really sucks,
I just used the online translator and let you spin dealing with
your own ineptitude.
You obviously didn't even know how to use your "online translater". E.g.
you included the word "but" in your pathetic mistranslation. The word for
"but" in Spanish is "pero", which doesn't appear anywhere in my original
text. What a hypocritical cretin.
but the poisonous pooch couldn't do any better than to attempt
to mangle my words and meaning. One vile, sick, twisted, delusional,
compulsively lying, hateful puppy it is.
Spoken like a true taxcheat.
Liar, liar, liar. You've seen how I live. I earn more money in my law
practice every year than you and Wormtongue combined. Not even you could
imagine in your most demented dreams that I need to cheat the tax
authorities out of $25.00. And you know perfectly well that all I ever
said
at that dinner was "Maybe if I asked you if you have a will yet I could
write off this dinner." It was said in obvious jest, and you know it,
liar.
And it was said in a few seconds, with *no* followup whatsoever, between
the
time we paid our bills and got our credit cards back from the waiter.
Contrary to your brazen lies, there was *no* "fifteen minute* diatribe
from
me about it at any time during that dinner.
The only extended diatribe that occurred at that dinner came from you with
your insane drivel about Stereophile and blind tests.
The fact is, I don't even do wills. I do trusts and estate planning,
among
other things.
You now pretend to have taken me seriously, despite the obvious jesting in
my tone of voice and facial expressions. If you're that dense as to take
it
seriously, you've just proven you're another utterly humorless
right-winger
who can't think his way out of a wet paper bag - you seriously expect
anyone
including yourself to believe I need $25 from the government, and would
risk
my license to practice law over such a pittance?
Wonder if after all these failed months/years of marital counseling,
his
disgusted wife finally served the Terrierborg with the divorce
papers -
he
appears to be in a particularly foul - and I do mean *foul* (as in
stench)
mood today.
Pity the kids with a 70 year old smoking parent leading them through
their
teen years. Hope you've at least established a trust for them.
I'm 58, asswipe, and in far better health than you are, lardass. I could
throw you through a wall with one hand tied behind my back. You've seen
the
gym I've been going to regularly since 2002 - unlike you, who hangs around
the house playing pool and pouring more beer into his beer belly. I'm 12
years your senior, although you behave more like a 12 year old. And pity
your son, who has such a distastrous father, spoiling him rotten,
completely
unable to instill any self-discipline in him, and who even brags about how
reckless and rule-breaking the poor boy has become.
The law doesn't allow one to set up a trust fund for children until
they're
born, idiot. When they are born I will be setting up educational funds
for
their future college expenses. And there will be no trust fund. There
will
be a "family trust" to avoid probate after our childrens' parents are
gone.
And I'm down to 5 cigarettes a day, and about to quit entirely. And my
lungs are perfectly pink - my smoking hasn't affected them at all.
Even your new buddy Sack-O-**** knows what a liar you are about my
Martin-Logan speakers supposedly being flat up against the back wall of my
listening room. So does Marc Phillips. So do several other former
RAO'ers
who have seen and listened to my system.
IOW, you're not fooling anyone with your vapid lies, poochy.
Facts about Sanders:
This is my experience with Sanders and dinners. He never
tried any tax dodges when I was with him:
I have dined with sanders three times, twice at restaurants and
once in his home. At the restaurants, we paid our own bills.
Sanders never mentioned his work at any time.
I don't know anything about his sources of income, whether
from a trust fund or from a legal practice. He lives very well,
better than I do.
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---