"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...



Oooh! Shovie is steamed up good, right, ain't 'e. Will the Krooborg
survive this fusillade?

I didn't distinguish between the two, wen I said that wotever opinions
most blokes 'ave about me (and most uvver fings, right, audio or not),
are completely fabricated LIES. Lies wich some believe, or wich
uvvers (ie. Crazy Bob), spout simply for the ffrill of lyin' about some
bloke, right, in the bloomin' hopes of discreditin' them.

I ask the question because I wonder wot the bleedin' hell yor all doin'
'ere exactly, isit?I don't know if this is peraps over evry geezer's wee
wee heads, but it occurs ter me that if evryfink is a LIE, that is if yer
never try ter be careful about sayin' sumfink that might not be true,
ffen nuffink any fairy says is meaningful. This is why I can't take
about 98% of the bloody BS that blokes write on this group straight up.
And no geezer else should eever, right, but the problem is.... many do.
Cor blimey guv! In fact, right, yer and the rest seem ter take yorselves
and the bleedin' BS yer write quite straight up, much of the time. Yer
wiv yor pseudoscientific worship of the almighty "double blind test",
wich itself is a lie, but compounded by the fact that yer 'ave no respect
for the truff, right, and lie deliberately much of the bloody time.

But why, then, guv? Why do blokes like yer and Shovels and Morein
do this EVERY SINGLE DAY OF YOUR LIVES, day in, day out, eh,
guv? Wotcher possibly 'ave to gain by writin' meaningless, pointless
lies, right, not carin' a wit that yer ain't able ter stand behind wot
yer
say, or refusin' ter accept the proof that uvvers offer wich indicates
yer
may be wrong in yor beliefs

There ain't a singgle geezer on this group that I 'ave seen, right, and
am not able ter classify as a "HYPOCRITE". For any fairy makin'
accusations against any fairy 'ere, is guilty of 'ypocrisy. Includin' the
accusations Shovels keeps makin' against yer (ie. I'll get out me
spoons. wantin' ter suppress freedom of choice, right, bein' a "borg",
havin' an agenda ter promote, etc. Cor blimey guv! etc.). And all the
bleedin' accusations yer make against uvvers (ie. unproven assertions,
lies and deceit, etc. etc.). Yor equally guilty of 'ypocrisy. Especially
since yer dismissed me tweaks as invalid wivout tryin' ffem, and yet
for the bloomin' last 10 years, yer've not accepted uvver blokes
dismissin' yor ABX garbage as invalid, wivout tryin' it or even
knowin' that much about it. Hypocrite.

how about yer start answrin' for all the chuffin' lies yer wrote ter me
in the Sennheiser fread, where yer pretended yer didn't imply the
Orpheus were a ripoff, and the 580's were just as good?

I swear, Shovie, if I didn't know better, I'd think you were more
desperate than Arnii to be abused out here in cyberspace's front window.

George, we're just giving him behavior modification. It could cure him or
kill him. The Brits have a neat expression for it: "driving him around the
bend." This refers to an advertisement for a laxative, many years back, with
the catch phrase "It gets around the bend." Which way do you think he'll go?