wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com

Now SHP is mad at me and he'll not put up with it
any more. In his synthetic indignation he's reaching
for filthier and filthier language. After all, he
chose RAO for the freedom to market rubbish like " the
chemical X cream" and the "treated (with another X)
silver foil" and to be filthy defending it.

That's where radical subjectivism leads.
Enjoy! ;-)
--------------------------------------------------------

Arny, nice to hear from you at last. You and your band
of merry cultists

AKA believers in orthodox science.

so voluble when anyone dared to say
that he/she liked some LPs or preferred some tube amps
to some solid state sat rather quiet while SHP raged.

The joke and end game were obvious from the outset. All there was for use to
do is wait for the inevitable and brace for the subjectivists wailing and
gnashing their teeth when it happened.

But now that he is on the ropes (and no thanks to
you, or Sullivan or Pinkerton or your clown-prince you
know who) you're back into the breach attacking your
old windmills: "radical subjectivism", whatever you
choose to have "radical" stand for.

Ah! The know-nothing defense.

I have news for you. The cultists, the true believers of
all kinds and shades have one thing in common: they hate
the sceptics, the doubters, all those who ask for
evidence, even more than they dislike each other.

You'd call the local coven of subjectivists "skeptics and doubters"?

LOL!

The situation is somewhat reminiscent of the early
thirties in Italy and Germany. The common enemy of the
commies and the fascists was the "rotten democracy". The
Stalinists had a saying "The worse the better". The
working class will rise in revolt against the Fascist
government once it is no longer led astray by the
social-democratic traitors.
We know how it ended.
Enjoy???

Hmm, a mention of Naziism and Hitler.

I invoke Godwin's law:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/