A reposting
Sander deWaal wrote:
" said:
So let's compromise. As I said before; to begin with let's hear
from De Waal and Fella. that they listened blind to 15 repeats of a
musical fragment with someone changing randomly from "with tweak" to
"without tweak" . They would have to fill in "like", "don't like"
squares. 12 correct ("like it better with the tweak") guesses would be
statistically signifcant but 10 out of twelve would be of interest.
Now why should I do that?
Just to satisfy *your* curiosity?
Come on Elmir, you're sounding just like Arny here.
I never responded well to the phrase "Prove it!"
============================================
Sorry, I take it back. I thought you may want to satisfy your own
curiosity. My mistake. It is obvious that making 5 pinholes in a piece
of paper, with a photo of an animal and an aspirin tablet is bound to
improve your sound.
Don't look any further and happy listening.
Ludovic Mirabel
- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -
|