Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
" wrote:

Sander deWaal wrote:
Jenn said:


I think that one of the reasons that I generally don't like Bach on
piano (other than your stated reason) is that Bach had such fantastic
control of things that the "tinkle" shows the precision of the work,
whereas piano, with its inherent resonance and rich overtone structure
makes it sound "sloppy" to me. Of course, some of that is brought on by
the players as much as by the instrument. Bach a la Chopin isn't my bag
:-)


Bach was a genius.
Karl Richter, nor Glenn Gould could destroy the beauty of his
compositions.

Nicolaus Harnoncourt and Gustav Leonhardt, just to name a few very
famous Bach performers, showed us the way how to do it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
--There you a "De gustibus..." Both of them sound to me boring.
But I'll take this opportunity to mention cds that I find wonderful:
the truest cello
sound I heard on record: Janos Starker playing solo Bach's cello works.

Ludovic Mirabel
. -

The one on Mercury, or the one on RCA?

Rca(Victrola). I did not know Mercury existed but will try to get it.
Thank you.
I'll claim the right of voicing one's opinion however ignorant and
primitive.
I never shared the general acclaim for Mercury "Living Presence". To
me they sound too "bright" with emphasis somewhere between 2000
and 5000hz. (beyond that I have progressive fall off typical of an aged
male
who used to fire machine gun before anyone thought of protecting
the ear-drums). .
As for Telefunken Cantatas they seem to me to be one of the examples of

the D. Gramm. sound at its worst.
So there : to each his own. There ain't no test.
Ludovic Mirabel