Quick Fact: Scientific foundation of my tweaks.
JBorg, Jr. wrote:
soundhaspriority wrote:
Before, when someone discuss your free tweaks, you do not
hesitate to share your thoughts and opinion. You give forth lengthy
responses filled with many information explaining about your tweaks
and how interesting they are. Your replies were loooonnggg and
eloquently express everything you have in mind. The information
you gave rekindle my curiosity and the enthusiasm which we share
about our hobby.
But this is no more.
Sad, isn't it? You missing out on all the fun and all, to mock and
ridicule me. I'm sure you'll get your chance to mock and ridicule
someone else who speaks of audio ideas you are thoroughly ignorant of.
Strange that you wrote this 2 minutes before I sent you my reply to
your last complaint, which makes it the second time you reply to the
same post?!
It's very simple. If you want to play games with me, such as asking
me stupid questions, I don't have the time for that. If you want to
discuss the tweaks in a sincere manner, I might grant you the time. In
which case you'd better be clear, concise, and entirely serious.
Now you simply accuse others of ingesting illicit drugs and
hastily go away. This cannot be. Seasoned Rao'ers expect
more than just a faltering and befuddling non-answer.
Than why, 9 times out of 10, do they give one to me?
|