Robert Morein wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Robert Morein dishonestly wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

In response to recent messages I read, and as a response to all my
detractors who get obsessed about the theoretical foundations behind my
tweaks that they are clearly either not prepared to debate, or don't
have the intellectualy capacity to debate, I will point out one simple
inalienable fact: All the tweaks I posted takes about 30 seconds to
implement. That's FAR less time than the days and weeks it would take
hashing out belligerent arguments about the science behind the tweaks.
From the endless heap of scorn, derision, mockery and ridicule that I
received from almost every regular on this group, you have proven to me
that not a single one of you doesn't have 30 seconds to spare. Many
of you have nothing better in life to do -but- waste time. You show
that by hundreds and thousands of posts on RAO on your member record.

So if you were really that curious to start learning something about
how much you don't know about audio, the first thing you would have
done is try the tweaks to see if they have any scientific merit in the
experimental domain. Since its much, MUCH easier than trying to become
an expert on whatever particular theories or science is behind each of
them (although people have shown that it isn't difficult to pretend
you are, and attempt to refute them anyway). Whenever I have mentioned
details on the basis for the tweaks, either they were sweepingly
dismissed without any proof (even by so-called would-be "scientists"
and pretend researchers like Steven Sullivan or elmi), or I was
personally attacked with deceit, hostility and malice when trying to
explain them (by Robert, and others).

Deceit? None at all. Here is my personal opinion again:

I noticed that you isolated the word "deceit", but not the other two. I
take that as an admission that you were being hostile and malicious
toward me in your so-called "debate" attempts. I was not ascribing all
three terms to all those who debated me, Robert. I was lumping it all
in. And in your case, I don't think I can apply the word "deceit",
but the other two fit well enough (ie. DON'T CREAM YOUR EYEGLASSES).


1. With the exception of the "electret cream", I have no opinion as to
whether the tweaks you advocate work.

And your opinions about the cream are merely ignorant ones, since you
presume to know how it all works.

I suspect that you make money off the
"electret cream", and that you want us to buy it from you, as a result of
advertising exposure you gain here.

Just about one of the stupidest things I've heard you say. What
you've got going for you is that fortunately, you have a lot smarter
things to say than stupid things. I can't say that for most of the
remainder. Try thinking for half a second. No, I mean "really"
thinking, not the blind conjecure you make: I've insulted just about
every person on this group, save for the one female. I've been doing
so since my first post. Now after buttering everyone up, I'm supposed
to sell them vials of "cream" according to you?

Dr. Graham, I've learned a bit more about you. From talking with
individuals around London, I now understand that you are a practicing
psychiatrist at Priory and for NHS, with an specialty in adolesence. With
that in mind I believe I can discuss with you what you do on this group, in
terms you are uniquely equipped to understand.
You have elected to have a helpful, semiprofessional association with
PWB Electronics, where by exercise of your admirable literary skills, you
can presumably advance both their interests, and a subject that you consider
epistomologically valid, which you and others refer to as biogeometry.
Regardless of whether you receive remuneration from PWB, or choose to write
for them out of the perception of mutual benefit, there is an associated
social obligation. PWB chose to have a relationship with an individual who
could be relied upon to comport himself in a professional manner. Your
credentials suggest that you would do that. Your responsibility over other
human beings is huge.
Unfortunately, your behavior on this newsgroup is hurting PWB
Electronics. You are one individual, Dr. Richard Graham. The entities
"soundhaspriority" and "Richard Graham" do not enjoy absolution for each
other's actions. Let is now progress to the question of subjugation of the
ego. The subjugated ego is subject to societal controls. Anonymization,
which has reached the extreme on the Internet, has tempted some individuals
to release their egos from subjugation, in varying degree. While your
intellectual gifts cannot be denied, the better part of your posts here
demonstrate some degree of "acting out", which seems to be motivated by an
extreme need for personal respect and acceptance of your intellectual
offerings.
It seems that you have chosen to segment your life, allowing your
identity "soundhaspriority" behaviors not permitted to Dr. Richard Graham. I
personally know a number of mental health professionals, and I know that the
profession can be extremely frustrating, engendering great anger in the
therapist as a consequence of the nonresponsiveness of clients. However, the
notion that a "pen name" provides anonymity is fraught with peril. It does
not, as you might think, shield you from personal consequences. It is a
shield built on deceptive logic.
You are inevitably acquainted with the term "theory of mind".
According to those of us who are not believers in mental telepathy, it is
"theory of mind" that allows us to empathize and explore the minds of
others. The power of it cannot be overestimated. When I read your words,
whether they be a PWB Electronics newsletter, or one of these posts, or
private correspondence, I feel your mind with an intimacy that is alarming
and terrible. I sense the reverse of the river of thought and influence,
flowing now from patient to therapist. I cannot think of anything more
frustrating than the mental care of adolescents, but you must not allow this
river to continue the reverse of its course, or it will destroy you.
You must choose now to honor both your profession, and your relationship
with PWB.

Regards,
Robert Morein

Wow, if they have peer monitoring, I wonder if he tells his
shrink about these alter egos that he banters around the internet as?
That would considered somewhat deviant behavior, wouldn't it?