soundhaspriority wrote
JBorg, Jr. wrote:




Why do you feel that implementing your tweaks which take about 30
seconds would leads one to validate whether it work or not ?

How did you determine this?

How do you think? I listened.

Ok so, after you've listen, your tweak work after you cut an unbleach
3" x 2" rectangular white paper with a small hole in each corner and a
photograph of a cut-out 4-legged animal (with a tail) underneath the
said paper having an aspirin on the center pinhole. And then, placed
atop the speaker box.

Based on this, you were able to determine this tweak of yours worked
after you've "listened."

Is it safe for me to assume this?


I "read" your tweaks, and with regard to their validity, my conclusion is
that they're false but not directly verifiable.


That's a very strange thing to say, and I don't know if it came
before the acid trip you took or afterward. First of all, you can not
verify and conclude the validity of any tweak or audio phenomenon by
simply "reading" about it.

Well HOW did you verify that the above tweak of yours work after you've
placed the unbleach paper atop the speaker box and "listen" to it sir ?


To do so would be making a judgement call
that leads you into ignorant bigotry. It shows your belief system is a
religious, faith-based one; so don't kid yourself about adhering to
scientific principles.

(Can we save this for later?)

Secondly, if they're not directly verifiable,
then nothing in audio is. [...]

That is incorrect.

Which is about as absurd as your first statement about making
"conclusions" on phenomena you've never tested and know
nothing about.


Well then, how did you directly verify that the above tweak of yours work
after you've placed the unbleach paper with an aspirin atop the speaker
box and "listen" to it sir ?




--
I'm in the convoluted-mind fixing business. All my works are guaranteed.