paul packer wrote:
dave weil wrote:
On 27 Mar 2006 05:53:42 -0800, wrote:
Without the reference to the proper spelling of the name
"Kurt", your reply is senseless and has no comic element to it.
Say the name Kurt out loud and then say the word "curt" out loud. Then
factor in the context of the post. Factor in the "three penny"
reference. Now, get back to me when you've figured all of this out,
Mack - publicly please. chuckle
Actually, Dave, I thought you were faking it too at first, but I just
re-read the posts and see that you were maybe just a touch too subtle.
Better back off on this one, Mr. Sound. If you know how to do that, of
course.
Is THAT so? Oh, okay I think I understand now. You're following the
"RAO Rule of Facts". Which states:
"If any piece of speculation or conjecture offered by one RAO regular
is confirmed by a second RAO regular... it's a SOLID FACT!".
Sorry, Mr. Weillapologist. Your fault for being too naive and gullible,
as to buy this proven pathological liar's story that he knew the
reference Sander was referring to, but he's so "clever", he didn't
need to spell the name properly... or even refer to the name. I've
given Garbage Boy many culutral references that went straight over his
fat head, without him having a clue of it ever happening. Even when I
shove his head in front of his computer monitor and tell him what I'm
referring to, the dimwit _still_ doesn't get the reference. He claims
to have a "classical education". Well, ask him who Dr. Parrington was,
and see how many times he'll duck the question (I counted TWELVE
times). It's not the first time Weill has tried slimy face-saving
excuses like we see above, and by George the Greek, it won't be the
last. You back off on this one, since you clearly don't know what
you're talking about.