This is the story of the fellow who tried to prove this group was full
of intelligent, independent thinkers, and not just a bunch of
slack-jawed ignorant mindless nitwits, who dismiss every audio claim
they're too stupid and scared to understand, preferring to remain
willfully ignorant their entire lives. His name is David Weill. He has
had quite the death grip on my ankles for some time now, trolling me
like my back ain't got no bone. He claimed to have superior
intelligence and education to everyone here. His proof? Well... if for
example, you use the words "Monty Python" in your message, Davey will
then claim that you could not possibly have an advanced education or
come from a fine school, so you must be a low-brow dunderhead. Yes,
simply for having referred to "Monty Python" in order to convey a point
to Mr. Weill in a vernacular he might have a chance of understanding.
He then claimed I didn't have the "courage" to explain what my tweaks
were based on, when he simply didn't have the intelligence to realize
that I already had attempted to do so on numerous occasions. After
offering up some ridiculously stupid fake tweaks of his own, his
"response" to not being able to understand mine, he then goaded me to
explain what my tweaks were based on, telling me I didn't have the
courage to say. So I decided to answer his trolling, and explain the
basis for one of my tweaks. I then stated that as hostile as he was
toward me, and as superior to me in intelligence and knowledge as he
claimed to be, if he was able to defeat the theory I presented him with
_valid and credible scientific evidence that disproves the theories_,
he would win the hearts of RAOers, and that I would leave the group
immediately and forevermore. I told him he had the opportunity to be a
"hero" in effect. To do what NO OTHER RAO member has EVER been able to
do since I've been he which is to prove that my tweaks are
baseless, using credible and valid scientific evidence, and not the
usual vigorous assertions that aren't worth jelly squat.
Guess what happened? Weill CHOKED. He chocked hard, and he choked GOOD.
You can see him choking in the message below. He emitted a couple of
faint sounds that resembled some form of incoherent squawking (like a
dying chicken would make), some sort of idiotic gibberish that falls
squarely in the category of "sweeping dismissal". The thing that I
asked him not to do if he was to prove his superior intelligence to me,
particuarly since he was the one who insisted that my tweaks were
"insane", with no basis whatsoever.
On 23 Mar 2006 12:11:21 -0800, wrote:
The 5-pinhole paper tweak, the one you so love to
ignorantly deride, is based upon principles of morphic resonance.
Now's your chance to show off some of that "superior education" you
think you have.LOL!
OKAY FOLKS! That was the setup. Now here's where "Garbage Bag Boy"
chokes. Note the complete absence of "valid, scientific evidence" in
this "sweeping dismissal":
Dave Weill replies:
All of your posts are an attempt at "morphic resonance". So what?
Get back to me when you've tried a resonance tweak that has sound
principles behind it - like my 4 acoustic guitar tweak. Until then,
you'll just show yourself to be the very sort of ostrich-in-the-sand
type of RAOer that you claim others are.
This response is a snapshot picture of Dave Weill, the idiot I've
always proven him to be. It has absolutely 0 credible scientific
evidence or evidence of ANY kind. It's simply yet another
Middius-style dumbass quip, which I predicted he would make, and which
I asked him not to, if he was hoping to back up his big talk with some
intelligence for a change. It shows that Weill, master of quantum
mechanics as he claims to be, is trying to cover for the fact that he
hasn't CLUE ONE as to what "morphic resonance" is. He thinks it has
something to do with sonic vibrations, because he sees the word
"resonance"! He dismisses the principle without once trying to offer
any evidence that disproves the principle. And then out of sheer
desperation, he tries an old "smoke and mirrors" debating trick (which
Krueger knows all too well). Which is to wriggle out of a proper
response by changing the subject..... in this case, to that of his
bogus tweak.
For this superb display of sure-footed ignorance Weill, you get the
"Big-Mouthed Ignorant Troll Of The Year" award. On a group like RAO,
trust me, that's an honour.
ORIGINAL POST: Here's how this started in further detail:
Garbage Boy writes:
Now, since you don't have the guts to explain how YOUR tweaks have any
basis in reality, stop demanding others to do the same.
SHP replies:
(snip) Want me to prove you WRONG, once again?
Is that what you want, garbage bag boy? Fine, I'm feeling a little
generous today. The 5-pinhole paper tweak, the one you so love to
ignorantly deride, is based upon principles of morphic resonance.
Now's your chance to show off some of that "superior education" you
think you have.LOL!
Now I know you're just dying to attack that theory, and bash it good
with a bat, until it can speak no more. If you can't, then post an
apology for being the ignorant **** that I say you are. If you decide
to cram all night and learn all about quantum mechanics and such in the
next 24 h, then let's see what an "intelligent response" from Garbage
Boy looks like. You will surprise both me, my colleagues, and everyone
else here if you are able to intelligently defeat the morphic resonance
theories with credible scientific evidence that proves them invalid. In
doing so, you will not only be the hero of RAO (having "soundly"
defeated the great tweako freak on his own ground), but you'll have
proved yourself smarter than a league of scientists who've been
developing the theories for 30 years. I'd say that puts you eligible
for a Nobel prize, in consideration of what you're up against.
Now don't let me see you come back with the usual dumbass
Middius-style quip and blind ignorant ridicule. You're better than
that, remember? You're the one who pretends you're something more
than a cretinous diaper-stain, so stop flapping your big mouth and
blabbing BS already, and prove it with _credible evidence_ that can
defeat the theories, not idiotic sweeping dismissals of them.