In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.

I think I know what's going on here. You're trying to parse the Krooborg's
manic descent into full-blown borganoia as if rational motivations were at
play. That will never work.

Have you noticed all the times Mr. **** has klaimed he "proved" you did or
said something? No matter how many times you ask for substantiation of these
Kroo-klaims, all you get is "asked and answered". The Krooborg's
konsciousness, such as it is, does not derive facts the way a sane human
being's does. It invents premises that it can attack (i.e. strawborgs, or
what many call putting words in others' mouths). However, unlike when a sane
person does this as a means of parody or ridicule, the Krooborg is entirely
serious in its utterly concrete way. When it klaims, for example, that you
attacked it, the "proof" it has "asked and answered" need exist only in its
tortured mind. No objective, ascertainable evidence need be produced for the
Beast to believe its random accusations utterly and completely.

Nobody has ever been able to connect the Krooborg to the reality of us
humans. You might as well try arguing the virtues of art or music with a
houseplant.

Hey George, would you mind sending me your email address so I can write
to you? Thanks, Jenn