Amazing HI COST Audio Tweak No. 3 !! For Advanced Audiophiles Only!
wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
:
: wrote in message
: oups.com...
: :
: : Ruud Broens wrote:
:
: I think it is outside the arena of fun when suggestions that will cause
: serious damage to gear are posted. Your reply ?
:
: My reply was that you're dead wrong, and you're adamant about being
: dead wrong, too.
prove it.
I've offered proof that you're wrong, I've told you
: that I've had no problems whatsoever grounding my speakers, and have
: done this with numerous amps; only benefits result.
telling it is so doesn't make it so. i could tell you, for instance,
i've got some cold fusion generators in the basement, generating
net energy in abundance...
: Whether you want to
: perform this or any other tweak or whether you don't, that's your
: business. Whether anyone else wishes to, that's theirs. Since you don't
: believe in doing tweaks, it's a moot point, isn't it. You think your
: miserable standard of sound quality should be eveyrone else's.
delusions of omniscience, noted
:
: : You've never tried this or any of my other
: : tweaks, so as with everyone else who hasn't tried the tweaks, you don't
: : know what you're talking about.
:
: You are confusing issues. Posting things that have destructive results
: are not tweaks, but plainly unethical posts.
:
: YOURS is the plainly unethical post, to claim "destructive results"
: over a tweak you've never tried, but that I have many times without any
: such thing whatsoever. You, like many others around here, have a
: problem admitting when you're wrong.
but you're wrong, having a problem admitting to be wrong
is an ego issue - don't have 'm ;-)
:
: : You're trying to obfuscate the matter
: : with technical arguments that are not valid in my case, any more than
: : they invalidate the manufacturers of grounded loudspeakers.
:
: Please state your case as to why the technical arguments that
: strongly suggest _not_ to evaluate this tweak for real are not valid
:
: Are you really that stupid? I'm not going to keep explaining this to
: you for three weeks, if you still don't get it: my positive results
: with the technique negates the need to argue theories for the next
: three weeks.
hm, are you saying you have a required recuperation period of 3 weeks,
when confronted with arguments ? That must explain your perception
of 'class' :-)
I've already proven your theories wrong by experience. And
: I'm fully prepared to demonstrate the validity of my technique in
: person. That means you need to educate yourself on what you're talking
: about.
:
: : Your
: : arguments only prove your ignorance. So as I have extended to others, I
: : invite you to come to my place and I will demonstrate how tragically
: : wrong you are.
:
: shorting/near shorting problems aside,
: connecting all + phase connections of the drivers together will result in:
: no longer functioning crossover filter
: tweeter being blown out in a matter of seconds - they don't like 50 Hz, mucho
: :-)
:
: Yeah, all that and aliens probing you anally.
he, that was a lucky guess, yes ?
can't recall i've posted that
anyway, you should've seen their faces, when i said:
"now, it's _my_ probing time" :-)
: STOP posting detailed instructions on how to do the wiring. If i can't
: figure it out by then, then you're not an advanced audiophile and the
: tweak is not for you. The problem is you need to stop imaginging and
: try it yourself, if you're that interested. If you're only interested
: in Monty Python style arguments, then bugger off.
: You're clearly trying to be deceitful here, and not at all sincere with
: me.
:
: when i'm in the mood,
: that is
:
: You obviously weren't in the mood, so you decided to repeat your same
: ignorant and deceitful arguments. One thing about you RAO addicts, is
: that you can sure as well argue until you're blue in the face. And then
: argue some more, until you turn other colours.
:
once in a blue moon,
post tweaker
Rudy
|