wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:


Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
false?

YOU are the one that has _never_ validated a claim you made. I'm still
waiting for you to validate your claims that my tweaks are invalid.

You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...21bac98?hl=en&

No, you're deliberately trying to obfuscate, which is a very deceitful
tactic you must have learned from your puppet master, Arny Krueger. In
that post, I referred to the fact that my grandfather's ear was shot
off in the war. That has nothing to do with the fact that you
threatened me at "virtual gunpoint", in another post. This was when you
were losing the audio debate with me, note.

I'm not whining

All you do IS whine, westface. Why do you think no one reads you?

I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
of published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
on.

Well I'm still waiting for you to provide that tech sheet that shows
you engineered the world's finest amplifier, and any of the other
points I've called you on.

Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
lines of discussion to end.

You will get that when you provide the basic information requested as
to your evidence that my tweaks are not valid.


With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
the direction those speculations lead.

Upset? Who's upset? In addition to your other fraudulent claims, are
you claiming to be a mind reader?

Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
as ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.

Oh you _are_ gullible, no mistaking that fact. You took the first thing
written about ABX-DBT tests, and everything that followed from that, as
fact.

You are mindless sheep, westface. A Flatlander, believing whatever
you're told to believe. I never posted anything with the intent that
people believe it simply because someone posted it (and certainly not
presented as "dogma". Dogma is not a good thing....).
Being the idiot you are, it never would occur to you to try the tweak.
No, instead you've spent hours upon hours attacking me for posting the
tweaks, but not the 30 seconds it takes to try the tweaks you
ignorantly attack. You don't have to be gullible all your life,
believing in whatever you are spoon fed. But you choose to be ignorant,
and pretend you're not. If you're interested in whether the tweaks work
or don't, you would try them. If you're not, why do you keep stalking
me, and feign interest in discussing them?

Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.

And you actually have the cheek to whine about me not being "classy",
or about others and their "ad hominem attacks" or "personal character
attacks" with hypocritical tripe like this? And you think people are
supposed to take you seriously?


If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
that "abuse" and feigned victimization.

"Abuse"? Hello? You are one dumb, confused little lemming, westface.
You still think after all I posted, that I actually give a tinker's
damn about people who wish to mock, ridicule, deride me, or in your
case threaten me with a gun? That I consider it "abuse"? I've never
heard of "abuse" inspiring gut-wrenching laughter, have you? I'm sorry,
but you're stupider than even I gave you credit for being. You're
giving a motley crew of slack-jawed, mindless trolls far more power and
influence than they actually have. And underestimating me by a country
mile.

The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
misandrist.

Close. I'm a philanthropist. Hence the plethora of free tweaks that I
offer the group. Confused? You will be....


I must admit knowing nothing of the Enid Lumley
affair in the 80's.

Thank you for sharing that revelation with us. That's only one of about
60 billion things you don't know about audio, westface.

I ignored SHP's assertions on once again defying the
standard electrical practices, and if his statements are
factual, has created the superconducting sound system
model if all efficiencies have been maintained referenced
to contemporary practices.

Who said the tweaks have anything to do with "electrical practices" or
"contemporary practices"?
Strawman argument noted. I will continue to ignore your ignorant
presumptions, only because you are a fool, and a deceitful, abusive
troll.

The RFI/EMI shielding characteristics of 30ga. Magnet wire
certainly can't be understated.

Who stated the magnet wire was EMI sheilded? Blatant lie, noted.

I can't wait to see the wooden fabricated speaker surround
suspension system, non-metal voice coil windings, and
other innovations he's envisioned.

Show proof that I envision such things. In absence of proof, you are
admitting that you are a deceitful liar, purposefully mischaracterizing
what people say, after having targeted them as your enemies.

I'm definitely going to build a mud hut for my listening room
so I have no extemporaneous metallic objects in the space.

Don't you ever get tired of me proving what a mindless, loud-mouthed
ignorant twit that you are?:

http://www.dnm.co.uk/about.html

The company's PA3 S model is considered by many in the industry to be
the finest SS amp ever made, note.

There goes the Barco Lounger :-(

Forget about ever acheiving truly natural sound from your system.
You're a Flatlander, condemned to remain in hifi hash hell for the rest
of your ignorant life.