wrote:
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On 11 Mar 2006 12:20:48 -0800, wrote:

do you mean to say it's a girlyman?
Hans und Fronz will be so disappointed.
They wanted to Pump Up the sound.

Probably not your type..
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Snow_Photo/Snow_Photo.jpg
See my and her/his posts below in this thread.

I'm surprised, soundhaspriority has such a gutter mouth
when confronted by opinions and observations not aligned
with his/her own.

Whereas you just threaten people with a gun. Somehow, that's better.
But even so, you started attacking me before I ever noticed your teeth
having a death grip on my ankles. And you never let up. Why? Because my
opinions and observations are not aligned with your own, whatever you
are. You made all sorts of ad hominem attacks in your busy days of
trolling me, and then you whine about me doing that to you? Right!
Hypocritical much, westface?

Another interesting piece of hypocrisy to point out in your deeply
flawed persona. You just made the assumption that because some dork
found a picture on the net, then declared it was me, that this claim
must be correct. That's why I call you and your RAO associates
"non-thinkers", or "sheep". You never paused for a moment to ask what
Goofball's proof is that I'm the person in the photo, and whether that
proof was valid. So because you just spoon-feed information that YOU
happen to think is credible, you end up being even more of an ignorant
fool than before you got "educated".

It is to note, because it is exactly how self-professed "objectivists"
on usenet develop their core belief system. While paying lip service to
science, you people have no respect for scientific principles or
values. Instead, everything you know about audio, is everything you
know about me from that photo that Goofball pulled out of his arse. You
don't question what you're told, you just believe what you're told.
That's also why it's pointless to debate someone as stupid as you. If
you don't trust the source, you don't believe it. If you do trust the
source, you believe it blindly. Even if it isn't true.

Since you never validate any of the claims you make,
how can you be so bold as to call the information posted
false? That last post about Goofball_star_dot_etal shows what a
class act you are.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...0f76d26?hl=en&

You still keep touting that gun fallacy about me yet it was you that
brought the firearm into the discussion with me:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...21bac98?hl=en&


Who could forget this memorable post of yours:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en


You're the one with the fixation on guns, abusing anyone that
contradicts you. You definitely classed up the level of intellect
in RAO.

I'm not whining, I'm waiting for you to provide that bibliography
of
published works, or for that matter any of the points I've called you
on.
Your full of complaints of being attacked, yet all it would take is an
actual response and provide the basic information requested for those
lines of discussion to end.
With no facts, all we can do is speculate, and then you're upset with
the direction those speculations lead.
Were I actually gullible, I would have taken the first thing you wrote
as
ironclad, uncontestable, dogma.

Since your gender has come into the discussion, the way you yelp,
if you're a guy, you were ****ing out the window and it fell down.
If the level of non thinking is too high in this group, you could just
leave, but I'm going to speculate you're a masochist, and enjoying
that "abuse" and feigned victimization.
The other side of that card would be you're a misogynist or
misandrist.