AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - Amazing FREE Audio Tweak No. 2! For Advanced Audiophiles Only!

On 9 Mar 2006 22:08:14 -0800, wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:

On 8 Mar 2006 20:20:55 -0800, wrote:
snipped

I would not charge you for my car tweaks. You put two L plates on and
sure enough you learn to drive. If you put an asprin on the roof you
no longer have to hold the steering wheel ehile driving. You have to
be "open minded" for the second one to work but not for long.

Congratulations. You've proven you can be as stupid, if not stupider,
than everyone else. Happy now?

Hardly "proof", boyo.

Okay Holmes. Show us what a smart "goofball" you are. Instead of
dismissing the tweak out of hand with dumb mockery, show proof that you
have a basis for doing that, besides your dimwitted ignorance. And
don't just say "its up to me to back up your ignorant claim".

Just as a matter of interest... Have you ever managed to sell one of
your silly tweaks?

I understand you're out of a job, but that's no reason to be such a
rotten, cynical ******* as you are. Or maybe considering your hope of
getting one, it is?

I have a job. I tweak things for peanuts.

Oh. You mean you clean up the crap in the elephant cage? Don't the
elephants harass you for the peanuts?

No but it felt like a zoo today.

Who said that I "sell silly tweaks"? Oh. You did.

No I did not. I *asked* you and you have carefully avoided saying
whether you have any undeclared financial interest in things
audio/tweaky or not.

Uh no, Goofy, you didn't. I would have remembered that. Rather, you
presumed I had an interest in selling tweaks. But according to you, YOU
are the "crook" who sells tweaks for a living.

I wrote: "Just as a matter of interest... Have you ever managed to
sell one of your silly tweaks?" The question mark is a dead give away
when it come to asking. All the huffing and puffing has not obscured
the fact that you have carefully avoided the questions about whether
or not you have any vested interest in promoting tweaks.

How stupid is that?
You also called me a "crook", and you never answered my question, as to
how I was a "crook".

Just intuition.

News: You have none. It walked out on you long time ago.

I did not call you a crook but I believe where there
are tweaks "crooks" are not far away.

Do you have any more pearls of wisdom from a fearful, insecure paranoid
neurotic to share with us? You seem to enjoy making dumb, ignorant
statements, then backpeddling on them when your large red bulbous nose
is against the wall, you stupid clown. Here are your exact ignorant
words:

"You're just miffed because I don't fancy taking my brain out, putting
it through a mincer and stuffing it back in, so I can become a
tweako-freako crook."

You are implying I'm a "tweako freako crook", whatever the heck that
is. I'm still waiting for proof of that as well, you ignorant twit.

I have no indication that you rob banks, just peddle the sort of
useless ideas that end up getting sold to audiophiles, such as CD
marker pens and the like.

You have made a big effort to "help" people for free.

That's about the first thing you said right. It's a hell of a bigger
effort than you have, goofball.

I think of all fringe audio belief people as "crooks".

Based on entirely nothing but your complete and total pig-arse
ignorance. Either state your proof that "all fringe audio belief
people" as you so eloquently call them, are "crooks"... or you will be
admitting that statement is nothing but the opinion of an ignorant
****. And a true "goofball".

I don't need proof of my own beliefs

Nothing personal, note, you just happen to be full of ****.

Ah, the prerequisite ad hominem "objectivist" attack. Well then don't
take it personally when I tell you quite sincerely, you're a lot dumber
than you think you are, and a _hell_ of a lot more ignorant. You've
actually PROVEN in these last messages that you're full of ****. But
what you and no one else here has _ever_ proved, is that I am. That
says it all right there.

"ad hominem" Sorry I meant your so called tweaks were **** but you get
the general idea.

How stupid is that, to accuse someone of being a
"crook", when you can't even say how they robbed others? Or are you
assuming I "sell silly tweaks", and that must be how I "rob people"?
Since I never said anything about selling tweaks, especially "silly
tweaks", how stupid is that? And since you never tried any of my
tweaks, or offered any evidence to prove they don't work, then how
would you know they're not valid? How stupid is that?

I have a hunch that you are not "open minded" enough to try *my*
tweak.. Shame on you.

Let me get this straight: I'm supposed to be ashamed for not trying a
tweak you never shared with anyone? Particularly when you've never
tried any of mine, which I -have- published? Obviously, you're nothing
but a silly arse, and I'm starting to understand your purpose on this
group. You're the half-time entertainment, aren't you?

Why aren't you "open minded" enough to believe me when I tell you that
if you place an asprin on the roof of your car, that your car's top
speed will double and the car will steer itself? Because
open-mindedness should end some time before abolute crap begins. There
is no need to try every insane idea and nobody does so.

And since you are
a worthless bum who has done nothing to help audiophiles here,

They are largely beyond help, thanks to the efforts of people like
you.

Ha! Now your true prejudices start to come out.... According to what
many have told me, my efforts are completely wasted. Therefore, they
have no effect. The minds of the subjectivists on this group are as
constricted as the sphincters of the objectivists. And the minds of the
"objectivists" are a vacuous toxic waste field. So I believe, I have
again proved you wrong, Mr. Goofball. The people on this group are not
"beyond help" because of people like me. They're beyond help because
they have the same affliction many do, an affliction which you sha
they belong to a "herd mentality".

I am not part of any herd.

Their belief systems are formed
largely by what they're told to think and believe, and not an
end-result derivative of their personal experiences. Each group battles
the other to defend "their" beliefs (which aren't really "theirs" but
what they've been spoon-fed), because basically, like you, they're
insecure people. Insecure people need to have their belief systems
validated. Either by grouping together with like-minded people, or
fighting unlike-minded people.

Well, when I started thinking about how ears work, I made a point of
not educating myself by reading what others had published. That came
later to check what was missed and I did a LOT of homework then.
Neither do I claim to have behaved in a scientific way, nor do I think
it is always the best way. It is very slow, expensive and tedious and
I did not have the time or resources to do a 'proper job' and to get
as far as I wanted to go. If anyone wants me to do any science, they
can pay me. It is not always much fun and I can be as unscientific as
I choose in my own time.

I can not imagine any scientific/technical field where so little
progress has been made in the last 50 years (and that is so ripe for
easy progress) or any group of enthusiasts who have such little
interest or knowledge (or at least knowledge of what "experts"
believe) of 'how it works'.

You don't see you the way I see you. Because if you did, you'd realize
what an ignorant twerp you really are. You think you're a man of
science, as all your objectivist mates regard themselves. But you're
anything but. You remain willfully ignorant of scientific phenomenon
that you are currently ignorant of. Your "religion" requires you to
believe only in what you know, dismissing everything you don't. You've
not shown a single shred of scientific curiousity about any of my
tweaks, and damn it to hell, if I can find a single word from you on
the subject of AUDIO anywhere. Good God man, what the hell are you
doing here? Just to pop up and make insipid little comments in
someone's thread on random occasions? A rather inconsequential
contributor you are. But a scientist? Don't make me laugh! (tm). You're
a total non-thinker. So don't complain about how ignorant the
subjectivists are about audio. You're no less ignorant, simply because
you can tell an FFT from a DUT.

Pure nonsensical conjecture.

The only thing I agree with you is that little progress has been made
in audio, in a field that is so ripe for progress. But I blame people
like YOU for that problem. People with severely limited minds. Problem
being that they happen to be in controlling positions at audio
companies, in audio publications and audio organizations. This means
that those who are truly on the avant garde of our hobby and able to
push the envelope of progress, are often pushed back by ridicule from
those who are not on the same level as the pioneers, and audio advances
in baby steps. Yes, *exactly* as has been seen here with me on this
group, in the last couple of weeks (but I admit, on a much smaller,
more insignificant scale). What "experts" believe has no consequence,
since you do not hold the definition of what an audio "expert" is. And
the various people that can be called audio "experts" (including me, in
my own fashion), do NOT agree on what is and isn't relevant in audio.
Which is why you are a FOOL to trust "experts". Or at least, only one
"kind" of expert.

I gave up any idea of selling or "giving
away" any innovations a long time ago. First, they (audiophools) would
have to reject abject ignorance and belief in your brand of bull****
and I don't see that happening anytime soon. It doesn't bother me any
more.

That's almost exactly what I've come to conclude, and unlike you, I was
never intent on selling anything to anybody. Not even in the figurative
form. Especially since most of the tweaks I mentioned here were not
developed by me. Listen carefully to what you said, but now imagine its
ME saying it to YOU: "First audiofools would have to reject abject
ignorance and believe in your brand of bull****, and I dont see that
happening anytime soon". The response to my tweaks shows why its not
going to happen any time soon (but then, its not anything I'm surprised
by either). Your definition of "audiofools" is only a subset of my
definition of "audiofools". That's because I see much farther and wider
than you do. If my tweaks do help to improve sound (not via placebo),
then we can both agree that they are being soundly rejected due to
"abject ignorance" on the part of "audiofools", right? And again, that
premise being correct, its obvious that its because of a belief in YOUR
"brand of bull****" that my tweaks are not even considered, although
they cost nothing, require no technical skill, and take about 20
seconds to execute, on average.

So I think I just proved you're a bitter hypocrite. I can see now why
you accused me of being a "crook". Because you failed at cheating
"audiofools" out of cold hard cash, and you figure I'm trying to do
what you did to screw audiophiles. But in fact, I never charged anyone
for any help or advice I ever gave. I figured they can' t get mad at me
if my advice or help isn't useful. But apparently, the paranoid
fear-controlled nutballs on RAO have proven they can. Without even
trying the advice to begin with! I've been called a "crook" by you, a
"horrible evil man" by another, and worse by others here, all because
of free tweaks that no one on this group has ever yet tried!

Whatever..

I prefer to go sailing now to doing (amateur) audio 'research'
and just turn on '3D' sound when I want to listen to it and smirk..

So that's why you're continually here, and not, say, on
rec.boats.sailing?

I post a great deal less than you. I just get the odd urge to take the
**** these days. Sailing is more about doing than talking, for me.

Because I have not invested half my life, or a cent of my money, it
does not bother in the slightest if people are not interested to try
the tweak ideas Ive presented. Contrary to popular opinion by some of
your ignorant friends. That's because I've seen no shortage of
closed-minded ignorant twits in my travels in the audio community, long
before I landed here. You all move in the very same predictable ways.
You all have the same reactions and say the same stupid things. I'm
good enough now to spot a closed-minded ignorant git from 50 yards
away, I think. But don't you find it ironic that even though you're the
closed-minded ignorant twit you think I am, my attitude in the end is
the same as yours. Which is that although I can say I tried to improve
people's lives for no compensation whatsoever, and their ignorance and
prejudice does not permit them to believe that the "gold" I put on the
table before them is for real, I don't need anyone here to believe me.
Like you, I know that I can turn on "3D" sound on my stereo, listen to
it and think about all the "silly things" I've done to produce the
sound I'm hearing, and smirk. I have no end of confidence that my $300
sound system sounds better or at least more musical than the audio
systems of most people here,

I've done one for nearer $3...

with systems that cost ten times or more.
I've got speakers that disappear, bags of depth, microdynamic details,
flow, pace, tuneful bass, and a sound that captivates, no matter how
bad the recording. If anyone, its the true pioneers who developed the
ideas that made my humble little system into a giant killer, that I
feel bad for.

You have no idea at all of just what is possible and how far off track
you all are, or what has already been achieved. You have no ambition
at all, trying to fiddle around the edges, using magic, distortion,
wires etc.. Tough ****! I tried to make some big leaps and did.

Hilarious! Absolutely hilarious! Thanks for killing me with your irony.
You're saying pretty much *exactly* what I would, in talking about the
majority of audiophiles, and ALL audio enthusiasts on this group.
Listen carefully to your words, hypocrite: "You have NO idea what is
possible, and how far off track you are". "You have no ambition at all,
trying to fiddle around the edges, using magic, distortion, wires... ".
I dont know what your reason is for using those words, but I have a
valid proof for saying that. The proof is in the fact that neither you
nor anyone else tried any of the tweaks I just posted! That much is a
fact. Want another fact? No one even proved there wasn't a valid reason
not to try them! So if you expect me to have sympathy for you when
you're doing the same thing you criticize others of doing... "tough
****!", as you like to say.

...."I tried to make some big leaps, and I DID".

Do you do much deliberate misquoting? I wrote "I tried to make some
big leaps and did"

I have made quite a lot of progress since the reviews, kept it and stopped.

WHAT reviews? Are you really the tweako freako crook you just accused
me of being?!

It was a long time ago but I could probably find an old mag with one
in it, if you insist. I only ever bought three. :-)

and
never say anything of note or merit about anything, how stupid do you
have to be to call me a "crook" for offering free tweaks to people?
With all these stupidities in your coner, more congratulations are in
order. You win the "idiot of the hour" award, "goofball". (At least you
got your name right.... LOL!).

At least you have a *pretentious* silly name.

It's not at all silly or "pretentious* - but you are. It actually has a
very distinct and profound meaning, derived from principles of quantum
mechanics - and furthermore, I did not invent it. My "silly name" as
you call it, is in fact, a self-contained "tweak", that can improve the
sound you hear off your stereo system. But then, you're too much of an
ignorant goofball to know anything about that, aren't you? LOL!

You sound familiar
though. Are you sure you have not used another name which was not
anonymised?

Who said my name was anonymized? More presumptions, Mr. Goofball? I
happened to be born with this name. We, the "Hasprioritys" have a long
family history. My parents named me "Sound", because that was the first
thing I reacted to.

Fine. I come from the Howardsen ap flossy's and dad said "goofball"
when he saw me and it stuck.