"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
t,
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article
t,
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article
.com,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

From: Jenn
Date: Sun, Mar 5 2006 9:09 pm
Email: Jenn

That's correct, subjectivists are the most
intolerant and bigotted assholes on usenet.

Let me guess: you're against blanket statements,
right?

nob does this all the time. It must have to do with
those elusive 'debating trade' points I keep reading
about.
snip

I guess. Plus, if he thinks that audio people of any
stripe are the "most intolerant and bigoted assholes
on usenet" he obviously hasn't seen the racial,
gender, and sexual orientation bigots on usenet.
Unreal.

Well I don't want to associate in any way people that
are not smart enough
to know that those sorts of ideas are baseless as well
as not well thought
out.

I'm on record as being unopposed to gay marriage, and
opposed to all forms
of tribal or collective type of prejudice. I fully
agree with the character
over color notion and find anybody who is not in
agreement with it, is not
worth me bothering to know.

On this NG, however the first to start mudslinging are
nearly always the so-called subjectivists, that's from
observation. The minute you start trying to get
people to understand that they may have really heard
the things they think they heard and explain how they
could have been fooled, they get oh so ****y.

I appreciate your opinion. Mine is different.

You mean you disagree that it's the subjectivists who
tend to start the nastyness?

That's not a difference of opinion, that's ignoring
reality.

Not in my experience. The fault lies on both "sides" of
the fence.

Usual Jenn straw man "debating trade" argument. The question is not whether
the fault is entirely on one side or the other. The question is where the
majority of the fault lies. As long as Middius is a subjectivist, its a slam
dunk - the fault mainly lies on the so-called subjectivist side.