rsponded in post:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9d981d6?hl=en&


Less than 24 hours after I started the thread which you, yourself
encouraged me to do, your whining " I'm being attacked ".
What a total surprise.
I want to be clear on one thing right off from the start.
You, who keep trying to vilify me by being some internet gun waving
maniac, made the first gun comment about my proficiency with ordinance
in the post:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...21bac98?hl=en&


I was merely clarifying the issue in my response in post:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...cb4aa89?hl=en&

When it comes to maligning individuals, you are exceptional at it.

With all the time you spend talking about yourself and your evaluations
of
those commenting on your previous posts, it's difficult to
get a non-offending post in edgewise.

In response to the question how can we evaluate your expertise in
audio,
all we have to go on is what you've written.
You could have invited us all over and we could sit around the table
with your girl friend, your wife and her sister, and you could actually
demonstrate to the group the tweaking your doing.
I doubt that will ever happen.
For a savant such as yourself that continues to post what a back
biting assemblage of rabble we are, and how you will not continue
to participate in disscussions, you're still here.
Perhaps the rec.audio.tech or rec.audio.high-end forums
are where you would be better recieved with your enlightening concepts.