AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - An open invitation to critique Soundhaspriority's audio expertise

In article ,
Steven Sullivan wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
Steven Sullivan wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message

wrote:

Soundhas..etc is a staunch objectivist borg posing as a
"subjectivist" with a twist that he claims the absurd
together with the normal so as to lump them all up in one
that the normal is also discredited with the absurd.

An interesting theory. I can't really eviscerate it. It's got some,
but
not
a lot of merit.

All the borg know this yet they speak with him as if he is
sincere in his position.

I suspect that people like Mike, and Steven think "can this guy be
serious"
every time we read his posts. I sure do. If these are veiled attacks on
subjectivism, the veil is just about the right thickness to shed a
little
light without showing any telling details.

soundhaspriotity has made me see the light. I am now investigating
placing a potted plant on top of a speaker , to see if it improves
the sound. I suspect that talking to the plant may also help.

A heavy enough plant could change the resonant frequency of the
enclosure. Talking to the plant won't change the sound, but you might be
psychologically more receptive to a musical experience after a good chat.

Hope this helps.

So , a chat with a mindless living thing would improve my musical experience?
Sounds tempting.

No worse than a few Aves before listening to a Renaissance mass.

I'm a little leery about giving you my phone number , though.

That's not the most flattering way for you to think of yourself, but
whatever... :-)

Stephen