Trevor Wilson wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...
Neither B&O nor Bose offer good value for money.

**That would be YOUR opinion. For many of those who purchase B&O, it offers
a sense of style not provided by other products and, hence, represents good
value. Bose, OTOH, represents extremely poor value for money, since other
products can offer more for less. I suggest to you, however, that, due to
the prescence of wasteful output autoformers, that McIntosh amplifiers
represent spectacularly bad value for money.


You are triventriliquating again.

(That means you are talking out both sides of your mouth and your ass
all at the same time.)

Mcintosh also has unique styling and many of its customers feel it is
the best looking line of audio equipment in the world. Whilst I
understand the technical arguments against the autoformers as well as
anyone, they do not harm the performance of McIntosh power amplifiers
which measure very well. They don't sound all that superior but many
solid state and some tube amps sound even worse.

I feel the McIntosh autoformers combined with tube driven (as with
Moscode) MOSFET outputs could be a very good thing. I am not impressed
at all or respectful of McIntosh's reisue tube equipment, for several
reasons. I do think they should stick with solid state if they don't
believe in the genuine merit of tubes, and am certain they do not.

Since Mcintosh amplifiers are not the most expensive brand to be had
(but are certainly somewhat overpriced) one can not take excessive
umbrage at their poor value for money.

If you want to triventriliquate some more might I suggest you learn
"Fugue for Tinhorns" from 'Guys and Dolls'? Then you could record it
with three mics and a vintage 3 channel Ampex or Presto deck.