"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"John Atkinson" wrote
in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote
in message
oups.com
It saddens me that you keep raising this matter on an
audio newsgroup, Mr. Krueger. And _now_ you make
a new claim almost 9 _years_ after this tragic event.
Please, please leave it alone.

Look John, I didn't bring this topic up...

No, it was orignally Mike McKelvy. But you have run and
run
with it, fanning the flames when others let it alone. I am
tired of you turning almost every thread on the newsgroup
into a discussion of poor pitiful you.

But its perfectly OK for Middius, Morein and Sackman to turn almost every
thread on this newsgroup into a discussion of poor pitiful me?

You need get over
yourself, Mr. Krueger, and stop jumping down other's
throats merely because they hold preferences different to
your own.

If that was the true issue, then the current context would be even more
pathetic than it is.

Jenn begged and threatened...

Having followed these thread with applled fascination, no
she didn't. She asked you for your side of the story.

She shouldn't have given Art that much credibility.
We asked you to prove your claim that Art sent you kiddie porn, and you
replied "not warranted."
In other words, you give yourself carte blanche to smear people.

However it is true that I received some pornographic
email from more clearly-tracable RAO sources prior to
1998.

In your own words Mr. Krueger, "prove it." I find it
extraordinary that only _now_, nearly 9 years later, you
remember these emails.

I find it extraordinary that anybody would expect that I kept any proof
related to them around this long - but you've done so Atkinson. How do you
defend that?

The sources were, no surprise people who consider
themseleves subjectivists.

In your own words, Mr. Krueger, "prove it."

Asked and answered.
NO.

Am I supposed to supress the truth?

I doubt that you even remember what the truth is, Mr.
Krueger, given the falsehoods you repeat so glibly
about me. :-(

Come on John. You know that many consider you to be a habitual liar
because of the lies and false claims that you glibly publish in that
ragazine you edit. It is far from being just me, no matter how much you
target me. Your only reasonable defense is that while you've been
ethically corrupt over a period of many years, its made you a lot of
money. This is of course just my opinion, but it seems to me to be a
widely-shared opinon.

Besides this whole rotten mess is becoming moot, because listen-at-home
audio-only is fading. It was mostly a boomer thing.

What an extraordinary smear. Arny, you are a really nasty guy.