wrote in message
oups.com...

ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message
oups.com...
From: ScottW
Date: Sun, Feb 26 2006 9:24 pm
Email: "ScottW"

It is a shame that one has to nail a malicious 0.04 of a db. midget
over
and over again.
As I foresaw after a suitable interval he reemerges
to blather again about my
"difficulty" with facts. He does not say which "facts" in keeping
with his
M.O. of throwing mud around in the hope that some of it will stick.
I 'm not going to write messages again and again at his pleasure.
Better to
repeat what I said before. Till it sinks.
One fact I "had difficulty with" was that I said that Sean Olive
asked his
panelists which speaker they "liked better". In fact he said he aked
them
which one they preferred. Or maybe it was the other way round - I
can't be
bothered to keep looking it up.

Thanks for proving you do have difficulty keeping your facts straight.
You know it was your implication that they couldn't
respond when asked which is different but could if they asked
which they preferred that I contested.
I only called you a liar after you repeated your errors.

He went on about that for weeks and called me a liar for saying one or
the other. A stickler for "facts" is our Scottie.
The other I quote in extenso:

Scottie accused me of lying about Greenhill's ABX
cable comparison in 1983. Greenhill compared an early Master
cable against 16g zipcord.
. Greenhill did not give a diameter for the Master cable
but I assumed that- if for no other reason- an objectivist would not
falsify the data to favour the proprietary Master (Remember? "Wire
is wire" is an article of faith in the Chapel.)
I assumed the cables were of the same diameter= functionally
identical.
Scottie calculalated the monster gauge at 12 ( "or maybe 14").

He said I was "lying" when I said that 16g zipcord that Greenhill
used and Master cable were equal ( same diameter, functionally
identical,whatever)
I reread

Actually you complained that it took too long to download
implying you hadn't actually read it.. at least not recently
enough to accurately recall it.

Greenhill and found that the frequency response
difference between the two was all of 0,04 db. Yes, 0,04.!!!
Scottie had an answer:
Can't get your facts straight... again. .04 db was FR error.
What was the insertion loss?

So .I answered:

"THE INSERTION LOSS WAS 0,16 OF A DB. REPEAT 0,16
OF A DB.
Even dogs may have difficulty hearing it.

Another error.. as some on the panel did hear it with pink noise
and Greenhill acknowledged they did.
None were able to with music though.
Level matched test between the two were never run.

Keep your facts straight and in support of your conclusions
and you'll have no problem with me.... go off and
extrapolate beyond what the facts support and I
may be around to call you on it.

ScottW