Why scottw is too 'toopid' to debate with...
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: ScottW
Date: Sun, Feb 26 2006 9:24 pm
Email: "ScottW"
Sssh still can't stand behind his own words,
"Look, scott, no offense intended, but you are simply too stupid to
continue talking to."
Sounds like a guy I know who says, "You can always recognize an
honest intellect, they attack ideas, not people."
Yet after your 'ideas' were thoroughly proven to be asinine, you
weren't able to let it go. You continued to defend and indefensible
position.
No... stupidity is your incessant attempts change reality
with your claims. You think if you repeat this enough
it will become true?
That falls under the 'toopid' column.
Does your friend offer any advice on debating people that employ
circular reasoning?;-)
BTW, joining deLudo at the cranium isn't an operation destined
to improve your credibility.
He made a valid point: debating with someone that has been beyond doubt
proven 'toopid' is a waste of time.
So you've repeatedly said... but still you keep creating these new threads.
deLudo has difficulty with facts.... I see you do as well.
ScottW
|