AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

ScottW wrote:
wrote:
ScottW wrote:

I rub my eyes . I must be dreaming. He wants in all seriousness
to go on about the insertion loss difference of 0.16 db resulting
in 0.04 db. frequency variation.
After writing 6 messages about him he still doesn't know his name;
Greenhill.

Guilty

Does he know what a decibel is?
Scottie you're on your own with Greenville and 0.04 db. I
participated in this very, very strange argument long enough .

You mean you've been shown to misquote and infer
what was never said enough. Time to butcher someone
elses article.

Too bad you bail so quickly, we haven't had time to discuss
why you were sending me to the library to find an article
to prove your misquotes... when in fact... we come to discover
that you hadn't even read the original yourself.

Your behavior does for subjectivists what Arny does for
objectivists.

ScottW

Something worried me before falling asleep.
This morning I recalled: one of Scotties deeply felt confessions:
"That I'm a stickler
for the facts and you're not. Ok, I certainly can agree
with that".
Good Lord he means it:!
He means that going on forever about::
A) my reporting that S. Olive wanted people to decide which
one they "liked better", when Olive asked "which one they prefer"
B) my guessing that wires that produced levels differing by 0,04 db
(or 0,16 db. you pick) were same diameter
C) not remembering by heart every word and every table-illustration
of a 10 page article
warrants calling me repeatedly a "liar" and a lunaticand boasting
of being a "stickler for facts"
I was angry because of perceived malice. But he seems to really
mean it. Compassion not resentment is called for.
Ludovic Mirabel