ScottW wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


wrote:

I'd say if the rcordings are genuine and the voices confirmed, then it is
to
be believed, don't you agree?

And how can it be shown that the voices are genuine ?

And since when does heresay qualify as 'evidence?'

Since when do the actual words of the person in question, not constitute
evidence?

The claim is that there exists recordings of Saddam Hussein discussing
ways
to attack America with weapons of mass destruction. There is
confirmation
that it is in fact his voice

As opposed to an actor ? This sounds like ********.

There really is voice print technology.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/forensics/voice/

A don't believe a spectrogram can prove it's Saddam.

Any more than I believe that the techies in CSI can enlarge the reflected image
in a person's eyeball to get a perfect pic of the killer.

There's science and then there's 'fake science'.

Graham