From: - view profile
Date: Thurs, Feb 16 2006 12:37 pm
Email:

Um, nob, here's how you do it:

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialRe...20060202a.html

A second-hand account which has never come up before even though the
author served as spokesman for the US-backed interim PM just when
bushie and crew need to shore up Iraq support seems just a bit suspect.
I'd say that it would be stupid to swallow this one whole.

Don't you agree?

And since when does heresay qualify as 'evidence?'