AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51

ScottW wrote:
wrote:
ScottW wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Scottie you win. Monster differed from the 16 zipcord.

thank-you.

It took me 0.5 an hour with dialup to download Greenhill's
text and this is what I found:

Poor Ludo... can't even afford DSL..

"There was 0, 16 db (REPEAT 0.16 db) insertion loss
difference between the two cables
(He's talking about Monster vs. 16 zipcord)
or the CORRESPONDING RESPONSE 0,04 (Yes 0,04) db.
VARIATION , when they were connected to the KEF
105.2 speakers..

So you think Home Depot 12 gauge would have
come up different? I don't.

ScottW

The terrier trained to yap out diameters yap by yap ("Trainer
was it 12 or 14 quick please?)
metamorphosed miraculouslyinto a 0.04 of a db. buzzing gnat.
Oh well, such is life on the internet. One has to learn
to put up with gnats till a neighbour lends his can of Fly-Tox
Ludovic Mirabel

Poor Ludo... he get into such a tizzy he hears bugs in his ears when
his loose logic and false statements are exposed.
Why didn't you mention that Greenville didn't do level matched tests
between Monster and 16 gauge?
Or that Monster against more exotic cables came up same for 1 panelist?
Oh... that's right... you didn't read it.

ScottW

Keep on buzzing 0.04db gnattie. I know it is hard but practice
makes perfect and eventually you may come up with something
half-coherent about Greenvile whoever he is. You'll be then the wonder
of
the world: an objectivist, talking gnat.
Poor Arnie. With you, 124 and NYOB he must feel like Duke Wellington
about his soldiers: " I don't know if they frighten the enemy but they
sure
frighten me".
On the other hand anyone who uses debating tricks like
attributing
moronic statements " Blind tests can never be positive" to his
opponents
deserves all he gets.
Ludovic Mirabel