AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51

wrote:
ScottW wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Scottie you win. Monster differed from the 16 zipcord.

thank-you.

It took me 0.5 an hour with dialup to download Greenhill's
text and this is what I found:

Poor Ludo... can't even afford DSL..

"There was 0, 16 db (REPEAT 0.16 db) insertion loss
difference between the two cables
(He's talking about Monster vs. 16 zipcord)
or the CORRESPONDING RESPONSE 0,04 (Yes 0,04) db.
VARIATION , when they were connected to the KEF
105.2 speakers..

So you think Home Depot 12 gauge would have
come up different? I don't.

ScottW

The terrier trained to yap out diameters yap by yap ("Trainer
was it 12 or 14 quick please?)
metamorphosed miraculouslyinto a 0.04 of a db. buzzing gnat.
Oh well, such is life on the internet. One has to learn
to put up with gnats till a neighbour lends his can of Fly-Tox
Ludovic Mirabel

Poor Ludo... he get into such a tizzy he hears bugs in his ears when
his loose logic and false statements are exposed.
Why didn't you mention that Greenville didn't do level matched tests
between Monster and 16 gauge?
Or that Monster against more exotic cables came up same for 1 panelist?
Oh... that's right... you didn't read it.

ScottW