"Sasa [Sason] Miocic" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Digital audio technology. You ought to try to learn how it works
some day!

I don't remember saying that I don't know the subject...

Assigning voltage to a time point?

Oh spare me the expert-sounding horsecrap!

That horsecrap is basic fundation of digital recording...

No it's not.

Yet another craphead who can't read. I specifically excluded that
possibility when I said:

"As long as there are slightly more than two sampling points, the
reconstruction of amplitude and phase is near-perfect."

Yes, slightly more than two. And higher it goes, less it becomes. I
just concluded, and brought new thought.

Wrong, you added nothing but errors.

Nice, call your fellowgroupmembers crapheads. Agression comes from
fear. Yo do not have to be affraid, sometimes people makes mistakes,
even you...

Sasa, you were pretending to be an expert and continue to do so.

So higher the freqs on CD, sharper they become.

My boy you need to get your head out from that book where the sun
shines not, and spend some time in the real world.

Yeah yeah...

Thats why more
sample points are needed in high-end audio.

Nope, wrong.

And if you have good
speakers, you can really, maybe not actually hear the difference,
but feel the difference between
44.1kHz and 96kHz sampling rate.

Wrong. Look I told you were you could go and listen for yourself.
Let me guess, you're too cheap to buy a good 24/96 sound card. You
spent all your money on vinyl and toobs. Well, don't come
belly-aching to me with your erroneous crap.

Listen, not everybody can afford expensive digital stuff.

Listen 24/96 sound cards aren't all that expensive any more.

However, I
use Echoaudio mia 24/96 which is more than a good soundcard.

Agreed. The Mia is entirely suitable for your education in this matter.

Now hitch that Mia to the files and programs you can download from
www.pcabx.com and get started for some basic lessons in audio audibility.

And no, I dont use vinyl. Tube as a preamp yes.
So you only gave one page, maybe you just learned everything from
there? Let's not make stupid conclusions okay?

You obviously didn't read that page.

I would describe it as a more open,
brilliant, sparkling, fresh full airy sound. You can laugh but it's
true

It's false and its easy to demonstrate that its false. Just listen
at the place I told you to go listen to.

It is false that 96kHz is better sounding than 44.1kHz?!

Yes.

Man, this is going to my archive to laugh occasionally...

Come back when you have had your ears opened at www.pcabx.com .

True that we cannot "hear" above 22k or below 20Hz. But have you
ever "felt" 15Hz? Psicho acoustics are playing with that kind of
problems.

I can hear a 15 KHz sine wave if its loud enough. Why would I need
to worry about whether I can feel it or not?

No, actually you can't hear it. You can feel it. As you can feel
supersonic sounds. I don't have time to explain it to you now, read
some books...

But again you can't read. What I said is

"Furthermore in CD audio, that happens at or above 22.05 KHz, which
is way more than people can hear the absence of in a musical/voice
context.:

If you sit and think about it and have average or better
intelligence, you might eventually get what I was trying to say. If
not, have an adult explain it to you!

Maybe you should think of you additude first, and then try to speak.
Sound better, like 96k...

Sasa, you've already shown what your attitude is with your claim that
www.pcabx.com is just a single page. It's a whole freakin' web site that
would educate you well, were you to actually lower yourself to spend some
time with it.

But Sasa, you obviously know it all. Who am I to try to dispel your
erroneous thinking?