"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

Your suggestion was investigated by L.
Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51.

Below is a more accurate summary of the article,
reprinted from an old post I made on RAHE...a
thread that Dr. Mirabilis also posted to:

30 foot lengths were used.

1) monster vs. ....

That interesting but 1983 Monster cable is
not really relevant to consumers today.
More than 20 years later some still don't like
the implementation of their cable technology,
do you?

At audio frequencies and with any kind of reasonble
speaker load, wire of a given gauge = wire of a
given gauge. Since wire gauges haven't changed
since 1983...

If I could suspend my disbeliefs in exchange for
a nineteenth century viewpoint of physics, your
statement might be true.

Right, that would require about 2 millenia of advancement on your part,
Powell.

To do this I would
need to forget about the advances in computer
modeling not available in 1983, advances in
material science, manufacturing techniques,
improvement in overall equipment standards
and the volumes of cable reviews written in
audio magazines.

The inclusion of the last item sets the pace for the rest of your comment,
Powell. Something about the blind leading the blind.

I’m sorry, I don’t think that I could dumb-down that far, Arny.

Right, Powell. For you to understand how cables really work would take a lot
of development in the opposite directiong.