On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:36:23 +0200, "Iain Churches"
wrote:


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
.. .


Actually, of course, KISASS is extremely simple - that being the whole
point of the exercise. It also works better than your pathetic - and
never built - piece of DHT trash.

Just a moment Mr.P, just a moment. You yourself admitted that you
had not bothered to build your design, and neither has anyone else on
this group. So whence your assertion that it "works better?"

It's fundamental to the design - and note that Jute has never built
KISS, but no one seems to give him a hard time about that.

I was interested to build your amplifier, and showed your
schematic to the head of technical service at Swedish TV.
He studied it carefully, for thirty seconds, screwed the paper
into a ball, tossed it into the waste bin.

Yes, we've seen that claim before. Even if it were actually true
(always doubtful for your little stories), it would either be an
indication that the guy is a very poor designer and simply didn't
understand what he was looking at, or that he recognised it for what
it is - an exercise in the application of particular principles, not a
'good' amplifier per se.

Of course, his reaction might also have been based on what *you* told
him he was looking at...........

Hopefully you are a better mail-room operative than you are
amplifier designer, Stewart:-)

Hard to tell, since I've never worked in a mail room. I have however
designed numerous amplifiers, all of which are vastly superior to
KISASS, KISS, and indeed to any of other other trash that Jute cribbed
from some ancient texts and claimed as his own.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering